Universal Search Google – The Death Of Article Marketing

In: SEO

21 Jun 2011


Google is not thinking that way. You want an “original” copy of an article to show directly in their search engine and the rest of us a copy of the union cast into the “dungeon Google.” This creates space for others’ videos, blogs, photos, newspaper articles and other online media. ”

Apparently Google did not see that article directories do not have a value in terms of Web content. At least one person thinks and scrapers are more numerous and many seem to rely on Adsense as a revenue source. The directory section is for this reason that money from Adsense, and the immersion in an author for the article. I think Google has inadvertently contain lists items in the category of web pages MFA (Made for Adsense), and that is what caused the steep drop in the index premium for all article directories and more.

Matt Cutts explains that the solution to this problem, quality of content (no duplicates) and back binding. First, there is no such thing as an original if the author makes an article in one and only one article directory. To do this, it means a lot less “live” traffic that the search engines and non-directly from article directory in this case. This was the original method to obtain the traffic on the Internet before the advent of search engines. Second, the author has no control over that copy of an article by syndicated Google is chosen so that the “original”. There seems to be random. Go ahead and submit the same article, with the box of the same author, half a dozen articles, directories and see if you can imagine, not to throw in the Google Supplemental Index. Third, how do I get back links to the thousands of articles submitted to an article directory? Socialization is a big risk, because “to jump source.” The so-called You can not be socializing the “original” copy of the article and then the author of piss. This will be prohibited on social websites. The only way is to socialize your personal content.

In marketing, what can we do? I would say to change that, but what if it seems clear that Google is? Then we wait, and we grit our teeth as we disappear into our database for content in the supplemental index, Google PR ours, and go our statistics on traffic flows in the direction of the dinosaur.

Related Post

Other Post

Incoming Search Term from visitor


Advertise

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About this site

Fnhsite.com post about variety Search Engine Optimalization and Website Design information.

Sponsor